St Johns Crusaders V Aylsham Spitfires

NCCA League Division 1 Thu 23rd Nov 2023 00:00 Winner: Away   Verify
Board Rating St Johns Crusaders V Aylsham Spitfires Rating
2119 Moore, Geoffrey R
G
½ - ½
G
Slough, Andrew JS
1905
1965 Hall, Antony C
G
½ - ½
B
Hedges, Daniel R
1857
1862 Palaneappan, Senthil Murugan
N
½ - ½
B
Owen, David M
1743
1972 Abbott, Nathan J
G
1 - 0
L
Wickham, John R
1688
Penalty 1 : 0
Adjustment -1 : 1
Total 7918 ½ - 2½ 7193

Last update Stephen Livermore Fri 24th Nov 2023 12:23. Reported by Daniel Hedges Fri 24th Nov 2023 09:50. Verified By mark lim Fri 24th Nov 2023 11:53

Press / Admin Comment

Please note that the grading difference between board 3 and 4 was over the 100 point limit for St Johns Crusaders

Daniel Hedges

I will apply the penalty in

I will apply the penalty in accordance with Rule 4 (reproduced below for easy reference). I can confirm that the Board 4 result with however stand for rating purposes.

Stephen Livermore

Rule 4

4 (a) Teams are to consist of four players arranged in order of playing strength, unless changed by subsequent rules, subject to where two players have a difference of more than 100 rating points then the higher rated player is to play on a higher board than the lower rated one. (b) Any contravention of this rule will attract a penalty as follows: the game played by the higher rated player(s) will be recorded as a win for his opponent(s) and in addition there will be a penalty deduction of 1 point for each offending player.

Stephen Livermore

Board order

I notice that Nathan Abbott's September rating, which is what LMS shows as the main rating, was 1950, i.e. less than 100 above the board 3 rating. So this could be a misunderstand of which rating to use, for which I have much sympathy.

Stephen Orton