Manningtree A V Bury St Edmunds A

Division 1 Rapidplay Cup Wed 8th May 2024 00:00 Winner: Home   Verify
PDF   Excel   PGN   FIDE   
Board Rating Manningtree A V Bury St Edmunds A Rating
1  2283 (2286) Kanellopoulos, Panagiotis
B
 1 - 0
N
Wasilak, Piotr		 1737 (1970)
2  2283 (2286) Kanellopoulos, Panagiotis
B
 1 - 0
N
Wasilak, Piotr		 1737 (1970)
3  2290 (2349) Lewis, Andrew P
G
 1 - 0
B
Watkins, Alan		 1925 (1853)
4  2290 (2349) Lewis, Andrew P
G
 1 - 0
B
Watkins, Alan		 1925 (1853)
5  1910 (1918) Hutchings, Philip J
G
 1 - 0
G
Balogh, Jan		 1868 (1963)
6  1910 (1918) Hutchings, Philip J
G
 0 - 1
G
Balogh, Jan		 1868 (1963)
7  1669 (1634) McAllister, John WF
B
 0 - 1
G
Lovell, Steve		 1861 (1800)
8  1669 (1634) McAllister, John WF
B
 ½ - ½
G
Lovell, Steve		 1861 (1800)
Adjustment -½ : ½
Total 16304 5 - 3 14782

Last update Sam Gaffney Tue 14th May 2024 10:05. Reported by Sam Gaffney Thu 9th May 2024 08:34. Verified By

Ratings used in match

Manningtree A:
  • Panagiotis Kanellopoulos - 2248 (standardplay k-rating)
  • Andy Lewis - 2290 (rapidplay k-rating)
  • Phil Hutchings - 1910 (rapidplay k-rating)
  • John McAllister - 1669 (rapidplay k-rating)
Bury St Edmunds A:
  • Piotr Wasilak - 1974 (standardplay k-rating)
  • Alan Watkins - 1883 (standardplay k-rating)
  • Jan Balogh - 1868 (rapidplay k-rating)
  • Steve Lovell - 1861 (rapidplay k-rating)

Sam Gaffney

Ineligible Player - John McAllister

A1.7 Players may make one substitute appearance for another team from the same club in a different division of this competition. John McAllister is a nominated Manningtree C player in Div3, appearing for the Manningtree C in the Div 3 Cup on 4th October. He then appeared for Manningtree B on 11th October in the Div 2 Cup. That used up his one substitution appearance under rule A1.7. Therefore, John's draw is erased and the game becomes a win for Bury A.

Sam Gaffney

Results Entry Mistake

Apologies, Hutchings Vs Balogh should have been wins for Black in both games.

Steven Lovell

Extra comment ...

Thanks for correcting my error. I found the board alternation confusing, it would be natural for the first game listed for each pair to be the first game played, but that's not how you have to enter them. I'm vaguely thinking that the "correct" way to do it is to enter board 1 results on board 1 (for game 1) and on board 8 (for game 2) ... so that each pairing plays on boards whose numbers sum to 9. But that would no doubt have it's own problems!

Steven Lovell