Board | Home | Ringwood | Salisbury A | Away | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (B) | 2066 | G Anderson, Peter W | 1 - 0 | G Redmill, Simon M | 1900 |
2 (W) | 1898 | G Fuller, David Michael | 1 - 0 | N Default | 0000 |
3 (B) | 1878 | B Willetts, Graham J | ½ - ½ | G Manning, Andy I | 1767 |
4 (W) | 1820 | G Clancy, Martin J | ½ - ½ | G Wright, Richard J | 1731 |
5 (B) | 1602 | G Davenport, Robert | ½ - ½ | G Symons, John B | 1700 |
Average | 1853 | 3½ - 1½ | Average | 1420 |
Last update Graham Stuart Tue 3rd Oct 2023 08:53. Reported by Graham Stuart Tue 3rd Oct 2023 08:53. Verified By Martin Joseph Clancy Wed 8th Nov 2023 16:31
Comments
mclancy
Tue, 03/10/2023 - 00:38
Permalink
Press / Admin Comment
At 7:30, Board 2 for Salisbury was missing in "inaction". Thirty minutes later our board 2 was claimed the game. He travels 25 miles to play in the team. That is the only comment I will make in this age of instant mobile communication.
On a happier note, My opponents combination should have borne more fruit. Despite that he then held a position an exchange down very well. I didn't see much of board 3 and 5 but when I bailed out to take a draw, we were still playing on board 1.
From when I saw it, Peter looked to have an advantage on the board and was up on time but Simon was defending stoically. However, eventually Peter ground out a win by threating to win a piece by advancing his queenside pawns to record a victory.
A convincing score line in the end, but the contested games were all hard fought.